VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2022
1Ira Patriani, 2Elyta, 3Jamaliah, 4Ratu Zahirah Lutfie, 5Annisa Dina Amalia, 6Saiman Pakpahan
1,2,3,4,5Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak Indonesia
6Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru Indonesia
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
The use of regional retribution funds as local revenue for infrastructure development in the region is an essential concern for the government. Still, suppose the infrastructure already exists, and the user community has to make payments for the use of infrastructure or roads in the village of Rasan. In that case, it will cause various problems such as public objections. How is the analysis of public policy based on deliberative democracy on user fees for using the Rasan Village road, Landak Regency, Indonesia. This study aims to analyze public policies based on deliberative democracy on user fees for using streets in Rasan Village, Landak Regency. Using the research method of literature study, namely by looking for sources of information, both from books and related journals, using the retribution for the use of the Rasan Village road.
KEYWORDS:Public Policy; Deliberative democracy; road retribution; Rasan village.
REFERENCES
1) Dercon, S., Gilligan, DO, Hoddinott, J., & Woldehanna, T., 2009. Dampak pertanian penyuluhan dan jalan menuju kemiskinan dan pertumbuhan konsumsi di fi lima belas desa Ethiopia. Jurnal Americal Ekonomi Pertanian 91 (4), 1007 – 1021.
2) Dodge, J. 2009. Environmental Justice and Deliberative Democracy: How Social Change Organizations Respond to Power in the Deliberative System, Policy and Society 28 (3): 225–239.
3) Dryzek, J.S & Niemeyer, S.J. 2006. Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals, American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 634–649.
4) Elyta & Darmawan, D. 2021. Education Politics: Learning Model Through Google Apps in Office Administration Management of Diploma Students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 16(5), 2152–2160. https://www.un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cjes/article/view/6235
5) Elyta & Martoyo. 2021. Public Policy and Indonesian Diplomacy for the Acceleration of International Goods Terminal Development. IEOM Society International, 2573–2582.
6) Elyta., Martoyo., & Herlan. 2021. Formulation Model of Power Based Technopreneurship in the Digital Technology Era. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(6). http://www.insightsociety.org/ojaseit/index.php/ijaseit/article/view/10968
7) Elyta & Sahide, A. 2021. Model of Creative Industry Management in Border Areas to Improve Bilateral Cooperation in Indonesia and Malaysia. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1974670.
8) Habermas, J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society .Cambridge: MIT Press.
9) Haliim, W. 2016. Demokrasi Deliberatif Indonesia: Konsep Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Membentuk Demokrasi Dan Hukum Yang Responsif. E-jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia, Vol. 42 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320620717.
10) Hardiman, B. 2004. Demokrasi Deliberatif: Model untuk Indonesia Pasca Suharto?, dimuat dalam Basis, No. 11-12, tahun ke-53, November-Desember.
11) Jaya, W. K. 2011. Ekonomi Industri (Ed. II, Yogyakarta, BPFE UGM).
12) Kusuma. C. 2012. Demokrasi Deliberatif di Era Otonomi Daerah: Studi Kasus ‘Forum Konstituen di Kabupaten Bandung, tesis pada Departemen Sosiologi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.
13) Koontz, H & O’Donnel, Cryill. 1972. Principle of Management an Analysis of Management Function, 5th Edition, New York. Mc GrawHill Book Company.
14) Mansbridge, J., Karp, J.H., Amengual, M., & Gastil, J. 2009. Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study. Journal of Public Deliberation 2 (1).
15) Manin, B. 1987. On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation, Political Theory 15 (3): 338–368.
16) Mardiasmo, 2002. Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta.
17) Mendelberg, T. 2002. The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence, in Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation: Research in Micropolitics, vol. 6, ed. Michael X. Delli Carpini, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Y. Shapiro (Greenwich, Conn.: jai Press), 151–193.
18) Mustopadidjaja, AR. 2003.Manajemen Proses Kebijakan Publik, Formulasi, Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kinerja. Jakarta: Penerbit LAN.
19) Nabatchi, T., Gastil, J., Weiksner, M and Leighninger, M. 2012. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
20) Nugroho, D. R. 2006. Kebijakan Publik Untuk Negara-Negara Berkembang. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
21) Parkinson, J. & Mansbridge, J. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
22) Syafiie, I. K. 2006. Ilmu Administrasi Publik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
23) Tribunnews.com. 2019. Musrenbang, Pemkab Landak Lakukan Perubahan RPJMD Tahun 2017-2022 Tribunpontianak.co.id (tribunnews.com).
24) TribunPontianak.co.id. 2021. Bupati Karolin Buka Musrenbang RKPD Kabupaten Landak,
https://pontianak.tribunnews.com/2021/03/23/bupati-karolin-buka-musrenbang-rkpd-kabupaten-land